Judith Curry responds to charges of "heresy"

fertieg95

h/t Maz2
Let me ask you this. So how are things going for you lately? A year ago,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the climate establishment was on top of the world, masters of the universe. Now we have a situation where there have been major challenges to the reputations of a number of a number of scientists,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the IPCC,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], professional societies,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and other institutions of science. The spillover has been a loss of public trust in climate science and some have argued, even more broadly in science. The IPCC and the UNFCCC are regarded by many as impediments to sane and politically viable energy policies. The enviro advocacy groups are abandoning the climate change issue for more promising narratives. In the U.S., the prospect of the Republicans winning the House of Representatives raises the specter of hearings on the integrity of climate science and reductions in federal funding for climate research.
After, you know, contending with the fact they don't own it.

What happened? Did the skeptics and the oil companies and the libertarian think tanks win? No, you lost. All in the name of supporting policies that I don’t think many of you fully understand. What I want is for the climate science community to shift gears and get back to doing science,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and return to an environment where debate over the science is the spice of academic life. And because of the high relevance of our field, we need to figure out how to provide the best possible scientific information and assessment of uncertainties. This means abandoning this religious adherence to consensus dogma.

The Best Fact-Checking Taxpayer Money Can Buy
Judith Curry responds to charges of "heresy";

The Sound Of Settled Science