@ People's

fertieg95

if to a rather good overview of Microsoft's infringement prosecution of a certain Internet cafe in Dongguan, the case will rise to life and death of an industry. Therefore, if the domestic industry has been hit hard cafes will also mean that Microsoft lost a number of customers. Is Microsoft is to stifle the potential customers as a means of self-survival it? If Microsoft is another way to solve the problem, to adapt to the situation of China at a reasonable price to cooperate with domestic Internet cafes, not more in line with Microsoft's long-term interests?

the wave of the market economy, if Microsoft is an aircraft carrier, then the hundreds of millions of users worldwide is the boundless ocean. Chinese ancient saying goes, \Today,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the only interest in the eyes of Microsoft word, and not user friendly, no longer their responsibility to provide quality products and services,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], imagine how far Microsoft can go?

I do not expect Microsoft was forced to change because, as I do not want to see is because users are forced to buy Microsoft products. If one day Microsoft was forced to adjust pricing strategy, and users have no choice today, it? Allows users to accept Microsoft's King was forced to act, is really a sad thing! With respect to Microsoft, China is its use of \

do not know if consumers do not remember, the task of antitrust laws is to prevent market monopoly, and the resulting monopoly on the legitimate oversight, to prevent their abuse of market dominant position. Antitrust laws apply to economic activities within the People's Republic of monopolistic behavior; exclusion of competition in the domestic market, restrictive effect. It seems that Microsoft's practices in line with the anti-monopoly!

In fact,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the anti-piracy or anti-monopoly is a dilemma. But facts should not be heavy and light anti-piracy anti-monopoly, especially for companies like Microsoft - using the name of anti-piracy for the sale of real dirty trick, though very effective but also very practical, but it is still with the Chinese conditions and the introduction of the principles of anti-monopoly law is contrary. I thought the anti-monopoly in the end anti-piracy comes in many forms VS, which requires monopolies,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], regulators and consumers together look. Yang Peng-line

@ People's

For Microsoft, piracy and monopoly like a pair of twin brothers. If not adhere to the so-called unified global price, if not because of monopoly leads to the user's choice, I would like piracy and monopoly will not be linked with Microsoft, and Microsoft is not such a label 20 years. Over the years, around the world lack the voice to denounce Microsoft's monopolistic behavior,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but with little success. After all, unable to break Microsoft's monopoly, it can not compel him to submit. Piracy may be incompatible with the monopoly behavior, can not become a product of harmony. However, we think, lead to piracy, the continued existence of the roots? Whether it undermines the interests of whom? In the interests of the face, monopoly pricing has taken strong measures across the board, causing the user bear the high monopoly prices! Ever since, the only recourse to legal settlement with Microsoft's high-handed,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], led the Chinese Internet cafe operators to enter difficult dilemma.