 Wysłany: Śro 14:54, 15 Gru 2010 Temat postu: change in sales is not so sure impermanence |
|
| According to \Over the past three years, Apple shares rose more than doubled, while the market value of the second top-ranked Microsoft and Exxon Mobil shares were down slightly. If this trend continues, the end of this year,the case of Yahoo, Apple will become the largest U.S. companies. This will undoubtedly be a large company in the history of the most dramatic turn. 13 years ago, Steve Jobs (Steve Jobs) CEO coming out again, Microsoft has invested 150 million U.S. dollars, for Apple to provide a new working capital, Apple, Cupertino, Calif. Actually, I'm into bankruptcy,baseball jerseys on sale, although sometimes this rumors. But the prospect was still doubt the apple.
Dell (Michael Dell) in 1997 by thousands of audience composed of IT industry executives said that to me, Apple closed down altogether, got the money back to shareholders. Today, the Dell computer maker named Dell's stock market value company in the United States ranked 78. Apple is almost the equivalent of eight Dell. , of course,In addition, Apple's ranking depends on the size scale of definition. If the sales value of the shares to better measure than the economy (change in sales is not so sure impermanence), Apple ranked No. 42, four behind than Dell. However, this comparison may not be fair. Apple's sales in a dollar into operating profit of $ 0.29, while Dell is only $ 0.05. But even if the net total, Apple has never made it onto the top ten U.S. companies. This raises questions about a common stock: Apple stock levels and prices are so popular these days to run its basic economic value in the front? For some, Apple's stock price looks too high. But Wall Street's forecasters do not think so. Thomson (Thomson), a survey shows that 43 analysts had recommended stocks currently recommended investors to buy 37. Among them 15 strong buy. If the above views of the overwhelming majority of analysts are correct, Apple really has become the largest U.S. companies, that would be attractive change. 80s of last century the leader is IBM, AT & T had once occupied this position. 90 years mostly for the title of General Electric (General Electric) or Exxon occupied until the last two years of the last century, the steep rise in technology stocks that Microsoft jumped top. Since 2006, with the sharp rise in oil stocks, Exxon Youyi big lead. Apple and the firms, at least three reasons. First, the vast majority of Apple products sold to retail consumers, businesses, government departments and agencies in the role of Apple's sales in the small. Second, Apple's most important market not only in the absence of monopolistic control,incident occurred, and even do not have the leading market share. Third, Apple's products are not necessary for us ─ ─ religious fanaticism as a defense for Apple Mac fans,brett favre jersey, please forgive me to say so. other words, there are other products and Apple has the same function, and the price is much lower. For example, I have a MacBook Pro laptop, it pretty clever, but the price is the same configuration than the hundreds of dollars for your Dell notebook,Carolina Panthers Jerseys, which is a bit heavy, but the software is equipped with equally strong. top companies of the United States had previously played a very significant role in either the United States running a large computer, so that the nation's telephone smooth, so the car can be driven on the road the United States, or for many home and business computers run the same system. On the other hand, Apple is to make the role of browsing the Internet, management information and call the media a number of little easier, but also cooler out. Apple's miracle lies not only suppressed by competitors once PC manufacturers are now almost become the largest U.S. companies, but that it is to do this with people's preferences for their products, rather than is the product of necessity. |
|
